4 ms·
We too use Confluence and it's abundantly unbelievably awful. * Super bloated and laggy * Hard to get your data out/migrate to some rival system. Did your tec
by avn2109 9y ago
We too use Confluence and it's abundantly unbelievably awful.
* Super bloated and laggy
* Hard to get your data out/migrate to some rival system. Did your technical writers spend a bunch of time typing strings into a table using the Confluence table building GUI, and now you want that data as a .csv? Too bad, hope you want to spend half an hour in copy-and-paste + reformatting hell.
* Impressively broken search (e.g. if you create a page named "foo" and then search for "foo," you'll often get pages of unrelated results that do not include your page called foo)
* Can't natively show typeset math. Doing so requires plugins that are somehow both expensive, broken, and only compatible with narrow ranges of Confluence versions.
* Gross nonstandard markdown dialect
These are just the shortcomings that I can think of right now. However I think even Confluence is probably better than submitting PR's for docs changes as the OP mentions, since at least it's a wiki.
- dalemyers 9y agoThese are basically the same issues we have. We've ruled it out entirely as a suggestion. Markdown documents and searching on disk is better than Confluence.