4 ms·
How do researchers get paid under the current system? My understanding is that the journals do not pay the scientists that produce the articles. Am I mistaken i
by landryraccoon 9y ago
How do researchers get paid under the current system? My understanding is that the journals do not pay the scientists that produce the articles. Am I mistaken in this?
- Bartweiss 9y agoYou're not mistaken - journals don't pay researchers or reviewers. If they did, I'd be significantly less upset by their practices. As is, they get their product (papers) and their skilled labor (reviews) for free. Elsevier had a 36% profit margin last year, which is a pretty clear signal that they don't face sincere costs or competition.
- vanattab 9y agoThey are paid ether by their respective universities/institutions/companies and/or they pay themselves from the grant money they were awarded for a specific project.
- Chaebixi 9y agoBut the key point is that they're not paid by the publisher for the publication, they're paid to produce the publication by others. The publisher is just gets it for (basically) free and then profits off the fees.
- KGIII 9y agoIn fact, you may very well also be paying to get your research published. They get you coming and going.
- BearGoesChirp 9y agoAre we counting only monetary payments? I'm assuming there is some benefit that is given to the scientist for publishing, especially in cases where the scientist pay to publish. It isn't likely at all a simple relationship between two parties, but I doubt that the scientists are being irrational by using a publisher.
- landryraccoon 9y agoSure, but how does paying the publisher enter into this? The scientist may well be happy to have their paper shared freely after publication, since they receive no reward from the publisher. Scientists are only being irrational if they have choice in the matter. If they are forced to publish by the community / university, they may well resent being forced to use such publishers.