2 ms·
That's just laughable. Somebody at some point would have created an alternative browser with client side scripting. Otherwise you end up with static text and vi
by kowdermeister 9y ago
That's just laughable. Somebody at some point would have created an alternative browser with client side scripting. Otherwise you end up with static text and video. Wonderful. And plugins! Because you don't allow scripts :)
- Sir_Cmpwn 9y agoI don't think that it was a mistake at the time. I think that in retrospect it has been abused, and many of the things that justified it are now possible without it. It should be deprecated and removed. Yes, I know this is a fool's errand. I don't actually expect this to happen.
- iainmerrick 9y agoI'm with Sir_Cmpwn here (although I too realize it's a fool's errand, unfortunately). 90% of what I use the web for is static text and video. And I could live without video. :)