3 ms·
> same with apple - "now we'll ignore user-scalable=no and screw every responsive webapp out there" Maybe because 90% of responsive webapps would be better imp
by dx034 9y ago
> same with apple - "now we'll ignore user-scalable=no and screw every responsive webapp out there"
Maybe because 90% of responsive webapps would be better implemented as standard html websites which would improve performance and help preserving battery.
- somebehemoth 9y ago90% according to whom?
- dx034 9y agoAccording to me. Maybe even higher than 90%. There are a few applications where you need a single-page app. Google Docs is an example or websites that integrate a messenger (e.g. Facebook). For the rest, SPA are a waste of resources and work worse with slow internet. Reddit is a prime example. UX has deteriorated since they switched to loading everything dynamically (again, only me as a source) with no good reason to implement it that way.
- LoSboccacc 9y agowhat the hell are you on about now? responsive web doesn't mean hulking javascript monsters automatically.
- jhasse 9y agoresponsive web also doesnt mean youd need to disable zooming