13 ms·
I don't understand your argument? You seem to agree "we should be breaking JavaScript" but you're against backwards-incompatibility...which is just a way of say
by acobster 9y ago
I don't understand your argument? You seem to agree "we should be breaking JavaScript" but you're against backwards-incompatibility...which is just a way of saying "breaking JavaScript."
- boramalper 9y agoI agreed on this part: > to make people use less JS and simpler JS on their websites