4 ms·

If you go to McDonalds and someone serves you a turd instead of a burger three times in a row, do you go back again? If IBM or Intel served me a turd, I wouldn

by cjsuk 9y ago

If you go to McDonalds and someone serves you a turd instead of a burger three times in a row, do you go back again? If IBM or Intel served me a turd, I wouldn't go back again. In fact IBM served me a helping of WebSphere once and I didn't go back.

youdontknowtho 9y ago
They don't only sell one thing. They are the definition of a complex company and environment. Not everything they do is bad. Some things they do really well. Seriously, you had a bad experience with one IBM product. Would that keep you from looking at other things they do? They do lots of amazing things and make some platforms that define the sector for solving certain kinds of problems.
- cjsuk 9y ago
  That was one of several IBM products that I had a bad experience with. Lotus Notes too for example.
  - youdontknowtho 9y ago
    (In which I forgot about Notes and beg forgiveness....Sheesh. I had a bad experience with it too.)
    - cjsuk 9y ago
      Yeah it wasn't much fun was it :)
mseebach 9y ago
So you want to be the angry guy in the corner holding a grudge, that's cool. The Microsoft of yore was really yucky, and I'm happy I'll probably never have to consider whether SQLServer is the right DB for a job and that "a real webbrowser" has caught on as an accepted casual term for any browser that isn't IE. But this isn't that, and the rest of us here kinda just want to get on with it and build cool stuff and this helps us do that.
- cjsuk 9y ago
  I prefer pragmatist. I think we have the same goal really which is avoiding anything that is a commercial risk, money and time sink and that’s the status quo with this particular organisation even to this day.
  - mseebach 9y ago
    Ok, great. This isn't a commercial risk (MIT license) nor a money sink (free). So time sink remains, and whether it is a such should be reasonably quick to work out (give it a spin, see what happens). No, I don't think we have the same goal, and you certainly do not come off very pragmatically.

by cjsuk 9y ago

youdontknowtho 9y ago

They don't only sell one thing. They are the definition of a complex company and environment. Not everything they do is bad. Some things they do really well. Seriously, you had a bad experience with one IBM product. Would that keep you from looking at other things they do? They do lots of amazing things and make some platforms that define the sector for solving certain kinds of problems.

cjsuk 9y ago
That was one of several IBM products that I had a bad experience with. Lotus Notes too for example.
- youdontknowtho 9y ago
  (In which I forgot about Notes and beg forgiveness....Sheesh. I had a bad experience with it too.)
  - cjsuk 9y ago
    Yeah it wasn't much fun was it :)

mseebach 9y ago

So you want to be the angry guy in the corner holding a grudge, that's cool. The Microsoft of yore was really yucky, and I'm happy I'll probably never have to consider whether SQLServer is the right DB for a job and that "a real webbrowser" has caught on as an accepted casual term for any browser that isn't IE. But this isn't that, and the rest of us here kinda just want to get on with it and build cool stuff and this helps us do that.

cjsuk 9y ago
I prefer pragmatist. I think we have the same goal really which is avoiding anything that is a commercial risk, money and time sink and that’s the status quo with this particular organisation even to this day.
- mseebach 9y ago
  Ok, great. This isn't a commercial risk (MIT license) nor a money sink (free). So time sink remains, and whether it is a such should be reasonably quick to work out (give it a spin, see what happens). No, I don't think we have the same goal, and you certainly do not come off very pragmatically.