Not so fast. Snopes article is little more than ad-hominem attack against scientists interested in the cress experiment. Claim of "lack of an apparent biophysic

Not so fast. Snopes article is little more than ad-hominem attack against scientists interested in the cress experiment. Claim of "lack of an apparent biophysical mechanism of interaction" is just flawed and 20+ years behind actual scientific progress in RF bioeffects, see https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26151230 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26151230 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23802593 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23802593 . "Replication" attempts mentioned by Snopes fail to actually replicate the orig. experiment exposure setup. A constant ping-flood was run through Wi-Fi router in orig. experiment to simulate real exposure situation like video-streaming. Replications just position a Wi-Fi router in idle-mode close to cress.