4 ms·
> censorship A state should not have the power to veto any information under the pretence of national security. There is no accountability. What I am really ad
by maika 16y ago
> censorship
A state should not have the power to veto any information under the pretence of national security. There is no accountability. What I am really advocating is the abolishment of secret secrets, or any secrets that govern public policy, government decisions/workings/connections/longevity, and that all secrets should be made available to the records of history after they go beyond their limited window of opportunity. Hopefully, in time to counter abuses of power while they are still relevant.
> Privacy and secrecy are two names for the same thing.
By private, in the previous context I am referring to the individual.
> Violent nightmare
Examples would be appreciated. I don't understand what this idea of all information being immediately and universally available and the necessary decent into a dystopian nightmare, is based on.