3 ms·
I think labelling this as "DSLR quality images" is highly misleading. It's another interesting image enhancement technique, this time using DCNs to further pred
by imfromit 9y ago
I think labelling this as "DSLR quality images" is highly misleading. It's another interesting image enhancement technique, this time using DCNs to further predict what information isn't present or is incorrect.
However as the article says camera phones are fundamentally limited by the size of the lens and sensors, so they can never gather the same amount of information that a larger DSLR camera can. They simply can't gather the same detail and although we can get better at being able to predict detail in some cases it surely can't ever be same as having that information in the first place.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- dang 9y agoOk, we've replaced 'DSLR' in the title above.
- sandGorgon 9y agoI'm not completely sure i agree with this decision. You have editorialized the author's own paper title that went to a peer reviewed conference. One may disagree with the results. But your change will not match for a straight up search for the paper title, which I think is a disservice.
- dang 9y agoPeer-reviewed paper titles are not immune to clickbait, alas. But ok, we'll put that bit back.