And yet the comment you just replied to gives evidence that you are the one actually incorrect, as it backs up his original statement and strongly counters your

And yet the comment you just replied to gives evidence that you are the one actually incorrect, as it backs up his original statement and strongly counters your assertion. To paraphrase for you: vonnik: $1m purchase price is shady vasilipupkin: No its not it is the real estate game, unless you can show me $1m in mid 90's is shady for a 71 story office building in premium location on Wall Street vonnik: OK here is source: http://www.nytimes.com/1995/12/07/business/40-wall-street-is-sold-to-trump.html http://www.nytimes.com/1995/12/07/business/40-wall-street-is... vasilipupkin: <comment I am replying to> My advice is it would help to have evidence, instead of seeding conversations with comments that cast doubt with very little evidence.