2 ms·
I'm not changing the argument. I answered your question precisely, and added new information about criminal activity at the building in question. You have not g
by vonnik 9y ago
I'm not changing the argument. I answered your question precisely, and added new information about criminal activity at the building in question. You have not given a satisfactory explanation of the discrepancy between what the market pays, and what Trump pays. Lacking subpoenas, it's unlikely that we can know what the other side of the trade was. But Mueller's team surely knows. That's why Mueller hired a team of financial crimes experts with Enron experience. They were able to nail Paul Manafort for money laundering, tax evasion and failure to report his status as a foreign agent. Trump is guilt of all that by 100x. The coming months will bring it all out.
- vasilipupkin 9y agoWhere did you get the number that he paid 1/8th the market price ? You provided zero evidence to this effect. If he did pay 1/8th the market price, I'll concede that something shady was taking place
- chrischen 9y ago8 million dollars in 1993. 1 million dollars when Trump purchased it. 1 million / 8 million = 1/8.