3 ms·
Apples and Oranges. We're talking about changing the interface. Did you watch the video segment?
by nickbauman 9y ago
Apples and Oranges. We're talking about changing the interface. Did you watch the video segment?
- tome 9y ago> We're talking about changing the interface. Who's "we"? I'm talking about changing the implementation. > Did you watch the video segment? I watched the bit where he said if you add a constructor to a sum type you have to change everywhere it's pattern matched. True. I'd love to see Clojure's solution where you don't have to change any existing code! EDIT: Oh wait, I think it's even worse than that. I think he's talking about product types. In which case you should use projection functions and indeed you need to make no changes to old code!