4 ms·

i believe dep and glide allow you to pin to specific versions. i actually really like that imports are URLs, makes it really obvious where packages come from, a

• saghm 9y ago
  > it's a better system imo than a centralized package manager like pypi / rubygem where names need to be unique I'll have to disagree there; while having namespaced packages gives some advantages, having a centralized repository gives you things like proper versioning, which is worth all the terrible package names in the world to me.
  • carussell 9y ago
    A central repository doesn't automatically give you versioning, and URLs as package IDs doesn't take it away. These are orthogonal issues. It just happens that Go has chosen an approach for now that results in a lot of pain.
    • saghm 9y ago
      I don't think they're completely orthogonal; I think it's much easier to enforce versioning with a central repository than URLs as package IDs. It's not a coincidence that the most common centralized package managers (e.g. Ruby, Python, NodeJS, Rust, Linux distro package managers, and brew) all enforce versioning and things like Go and Vim packaging don't.
      • weberc2 9y ago
        Go and vim don't have "distributed package managers"; they just punt on package management altogether. The next step up from that is a centralized package management system, and if you care that much you'll probably build in some notion of versions (even if they're nondeterministic or otherwise broken, as in the case of pip, npm, and many Linux package managers). Building a distributed package manager is quite a lot more work.