3 ms·

You've cited a lot of recently proved stuff (DNC rigging) but are ignoring the other stuff (re Russia) propaganda. It seems very arbitrary. Did both not very cl

You've cited a lot of recently proved stuff (DNC rigging) but are ignoring the other stuff (re Russia) propaganda. It seems very arbitrary. Did both not very clearly happen? I don't think there's very many credible sources which believe otherwise. Probably if we could just adjust human susceptability to sell their liberties and fall in line behind authority figures we would live in a much better world. That only happens if you are realistic about what's going on instead of holding ideological political views. That's your solution.

wallace_f 9y ago
I just cited a source that debunked some of the Russia claims, which were said to be "added to the trash heap." Why are you ignoring this? There are lots of good reasons to oppose and impech Trump. Something is wrong if you can ignore the authoritarianism, corruption, and unconstitutionality that exists here in the US--that both parties support, which is why they won't use them as reasons to impeach Trump--and you have been coaxed into a need to make a reach for a dubious conflict-stirring story of half-truths and shifting standards. You should ask yourself who the parties are that win after every election, no matter Republican or Democrat, and what they stand to gain or lose. Why you, instead, follow the machinations and war cry of authoritarians that have lost all credibility is probably a testament to the human bias to follow authority figures.
- aaron-lebo 9y ago
  I'm confused. You cited a source which debunked the Russian hacking claims, but there's been a lot of evidence of Russian media influence (which is an obviously exploitable weakness). This didn't have anything to do with Trump. You're reading a lot into what I'm saying.
  - wallace_f 9y ago
    It has everything to do with Trump and the country. It is an attempted distraction, but the type of thing that happens around the world every year. Sometimes macroeconomists model concepts in the framework of households. Here is an analogy to help express where I am coming from: let's say every month your homeowners association has an election. For as long as anyone can ever remember, George and Barry win every time. Over the years they have installed security cameras inside your house, created conflicts with neighboring towns which profit their businesses and kill some of our children, and they have not done a very good job of taking care of the neighborhood. Along comes Don. There are lots of good reasons to hate Don, but George and Barry start a campaign to get him out which involves Ted, an adversary from an entirely different, trashy neighborhood, who passed fliers around with fake information in hopes that Barry wouldnt be elected again. I'm sitting in HOA meeting wondering why no one has brought up the security cameras inside my house, the fact that my best friend died due to George and Barry, JP & Morgan--who don't even live here--are getting a lot of our money for some reason, Barry's team is rigging the election process, and our neighborhood's health and environment is deteriorating. This was just a small start to a long list of terrible problems. But George and Barry are running the meeting and Ted is the focus.

wallace_f 9y ago

I just cited a source that debunked some of the Russia claims, which were said to be "added to the trash heap." Why are you ignoring this? There are lots of good reasons to oppose and impech Trump. Something is wrong if you can ignore the authoritarianism, corruption, and unconstitutionality that exists here in the US--that both parties support, which is why they won't use them as reasons to impeach Trump--and you have been coaxed into a need to make a reach for a dubious conflict-stirring story of half-truths and shifting standards. You should ask yourself who the parties are that win after every election, no matter Republican or Democrat, and what they stand to gain or lose. Why you, instead, follow the machinations and war cry of authoritarians that have lost all credibility is probably a testament to the human bias to follow authority figures.

aaron-lebo 9y ago
I'm confused. You cited a source which debunked the Russian hacking claims, but there's been a lot of evidence of Russian media influence (which is an obviously exploitable weakness). This didn't have anything to do with Trump. You're reading a lot into what I'm saying.
- wallace_f 9y ago
  It has everything to do with Trump and the country. It is an attempted distraction, but the type of thing that happens around the world every year. Sometimes macroeconomists model concepts in the framework of households. Here is an analogy to help express where I am coming from: let's say every month your homeowners association has an election. For as long as anyone can ever remember, George and Barry win every time. Over the years they have installed security cameras inside your house, created conflicts with neighboring towns which profit their businesses and kill some of our children, and they have not done a very good job of taking care of the neighborhood. Along comes Don. There are lots of good reasons to hate Don, but George and Barry start a campaign to get him out which involves Ted, an adversary from an entirely different, trashy neighborhood, who passed fliers around with fake information in hopes that Barry wouldnt be elected again. I'm sitting in HOA meeting wondering why no one has brought up the security cameras inside my house, the fact that my best friend died due to George and Barry, JP & Morgan--who don't even live here--are getting a lot of our money for some reason, Barry's team is rigging the election process, and our neighborhood's health and environment is deteriorating. This was just a small start to a long list of terrible problems. But George and Barry are running the meeting and Ted is the focus.