3 ms·
> There is clearly a difference between lying under oath and having opinions. You're shifting the goalposts here. We're discussing a hypothetical situation in
by jakelazaroff 9y ago
> There is clearly a difference between lying under oath and having opinions.
You're shifting the goalposts here. We're discussing a hypothetical situation in which the President tweets something literally illegal.
> Further, impeachment proceedings are 100% political, not legal.
The aforelinked article about Bill Clinton's impeachment also mentions that while in office, he was cited for contempt of court — another limitation on freedom of speech — by a federal judge.