3 ms·
The disturbing part isn't the "errors" on their own, but that it effectively came down to the integrity of a single person under duress. The system failed beca
by slededit 9y ago
The disturbing part isn't the "errors" on their own, but that it effectively came down to the integrity of a single person under duress. The system failed because it was no longer the system protecting the accused - it was the General under house arrest.
- Lordarminius 9y agoI agree. People high up decided that it was not cool to have a marine corps general under arrest. I have a few questions: 1. How is it legal to tap the communications of an attorney and his clients ? 2. Is such evidence admissible in American courts ? 3. How can it be that the general can be held accountable for 'allowing the resignation of defense counsel(s)' Is such permission required ? This is very strange.