3 ms·
Go has been studied for hundreds of years. In many cases, by people who study the game since their childhood and work on it as a full-time occupation. The cons
by partycoder 9y ago
Go has been studied for hundreds of years. In many cases, by people who study the game since their childhood and work on it as a full-time occupation.
The consequence of Alpha Go Zero is that it can, in a matter of days, disregard and surpass all human knowledge about the game.
Maximizing a score margin has been equated for a long time with maximizing your probability of winning. Alpha Go doesn't play like that... it's a substantial paradigm shift. If you see the early commentaries you will see that human players were initially saying Alpha Go moves were mistakes because they were slow and wasted opportunities to get more territory, to then realize that Alpha Go was actually winning.
- ImSkeptical 9y agoI think people have always understood the difference between maximising probability of victory versus score. Even in amateur games you'll get the feeling "I could fight here, and it would be complicated, but I might get a huge advantage, or I could just play safe and keep my advantage."
- aurelianito 9y agoEven kyus like myself play more conservatively when winning. Alphago just takes this to the extreme but it is common on most levels of play (from single digit kyus to the best professional players).