4 ms·
the op isn't an "employee" in this case probably not even a "worker"
by walshemj 9y ago
the op isn't an "employee" in this case probably not even a "worker"
- vidarh 9y agoThe point was not that it's exactly the same - I was responding to the comment above, not to the article. But even so in many countries there is the concept of "deemed employment" that may or may not give rise to employment rights. Basically: if it quacks like a duck, and walks like a duck, it may very well legally be a duck.
- literallycancer 9y agoThey presumably still have a contract where he does work for compensation.