3 ms·

I am happy JetBrains became a full-blown real software company (where I count only companies with their own programming language) instead of aping Atlassian (th

by bitL 9y ago

I am happy JetBrains became a full-blown real software company (where I count only companies with their own programming language) instead of aping Atlassian (their main competitor), and Kotlin has some interesting ideas. They are closest to Borland we have these days; independent small company with quality development tools. Though the code completion quality dropped so much lately (e.g. in PyCharm it became completely useless) that I am now actively trying to find replacements.

systems 9y ago
I wouldnt go as far as comparing them to borland Remember that the community edition is open source They are an open company and do offer a lot completly for free Borland was .. a very traditional closed company
- hackerfromthefu 9y ago
  >> Borland was .. a very traditional closed company One of the great things about Borland was they published the source code to their VCL (their main platform library Delphi and C++ builder applications used). So you could read, learn from, troubleshoot and debug with the source code. At a time when Microsoft and most companies didn't. And the VCL design patterns were/are incredibly elegant, and studying them an excellent and accessible way for an interested programmer to learn some real software architecture skills.
on_and_off 9y ago
>(e.g. in PyCharm it became completely useless) Very weird; what happened ? In java/kotlin it is as great as ever in Android Studio
- bitL 9y ago
  No idea; I do extensive tensorflow/keras/opencv/numpy/openai stuff and code completion there is a joke, I just get completely unusable hints. Maybe I am A/B tested by them or something, but I am forced to have browser with documentation/stack overflow opened these days. And IntelliJ used to be much better for me at around IDEA 12, since then code completion doesn't predict my typical choices at top places, I need to scroll down more and more. So that one is individual style-based. I also long for the days of simplicity as I refuse to keep huge amount of "how to do a certain thing in certain IDE" in my head; IDE should help me with the complexity of language and not impose another time sink on me.
  - stickfigure 9y ago
    Code completion has always been hit-or-miss in dynamic languages like python. Is it possible that something in your libraries (or maybe something in your programming style) changed such that the IDE can no longer make good guesses? FWIW I've never found IntelliJ code completion in Javascript, Ruby, or Python to be very accurate. It's fantastic in Java and Typescript.
    - yawaramin 9y ago
      It's also fantastic for JavaScript in VSCode, thanks to VSCode automatically downloading type definitions.

by bitL 9y ago

systems 9y ago

I wouldnt go as far as comparing them to borland Remember that the community edition is open source They are an open company and do offer a lot completly for free Borland was .. a very traditional closed company

hackerfromthefu 9y ago
>> Borland was .. a very traditional closed company One of the great things about Borland was they published the source code to their VCL (their main platform library Delphi and C++ builder applications used). So you could read, learn from, troubleshoot and debug with the source code. At a time when Microsoft and most companies didn't. And the VCL design patterns were/are incredibly elegant, and studying them an excellent and accessible way for an interested programmer to learn some real software architecture skills.

on_and_off 9y ago

>(e.g. in PyCharm it became completely useless) Very weird; what happened ? In java/kotlin it is as great as ever in Android Studio

bitL 9y ago
No idea; I do extensive tensorflow/keras/opencv/numpy/openai stuff and code completion there is a joke, I just get completely unusable hints. Maybe I am A/B tested by them or something, but I am forced to have browser with documentation/stack overflow opened these days. And IntelliJ used to be much better for me at around IDEA 12, since then code completion doesn't predict my typical choices at top places, I need to scroll down more and more. So that one is individual style-based. I also long for the days of simplicity as I refuse to keep huge amount of "how to do a certain thing in certain IDE" in my head; IDE should help me with the complexity of language and not impose another time sink on me.
- stickfigure 9y ago
  Code completion has always been hit-or-miss in dynamic languages like python. Is it possible that something in your libraries (or maybe something in your programming style) changed such that the IDE can no longer make good guesses? FWIW I've never found IntelliJ code completion in Javascript, Ruby, or Python to be very accurate. It's fantastic in Java and Typescript.
  - yawaramin 9y ago
    It's also fantastic for JavaScript in VSCode, thanks to VSCode automatically downloading type definitions.