4 ms·
Nope. There is no precedent for invading a nuclear armed state. So much can go wrong so fast that diplomacy is always preferred to war. Isn't it wonderful what
by Lordarminius 9y ago
Nope. There is no precedent for invading a nuclear armed state. So much can go wrong so fast that diplomacy is always preferred to war. Isn't it wonderful what a little nuclear leverage can do for you ?
- pcrh 9y ago>There is no precedent for invading a nuclear armed state. The Argentine invasion of the Falklands might be considered an exception to that.