I get that these criticisms can be waved towards the "design" version and maybe others like this. This though, as far as I understand, only means to show that d

I get that these criticisms can be waved towards the "design" version and maybe others like this. This though, as far as I understand, only means to show that devs use "element names" as a naming device for their projects a lot. As such it isn't trying to copy the structural logic and purpose of the periodic table but only using it's design to in an intuitive way show which names has been used / how much of the table has been covered. I think it is interesting to see how bad the fantasy of dev are / which names you could use to be original :p