2 ms·
Oh I agree completely, but that's sort of my point. The OP's solution seemed to be making everyone have 50 instead of 4,000. That seemed both impossible, and a
by notheguyouthink 9y ago
Oh I agree completely, but that's sort of my point.
The OP's solution seemed to be making everyone have 50 instead of 4,000. That seemed both impossible, and a weird goal. If you're going to try for the impossible, shouldn't we aim for 0?
I don't ever see us stopping N+1 nukes though.