3 ms·
> And, currently, a handful of [governments] having them is the best way to ensure that. Until it isn't. But then it's too late to try anything different. > I
by clarkmoody 9y ago
> And, currently, a handful of [governments] having them is the best way to ensure that.
Until it isn't. But then it's too late to try anything different.
> If all [governments] claim to destroy their nuclear bombs and never ever make a new one, would you trust all of them?
I don't trust statements from governments, as a general rule.
- mantas 9y ago> Until it isn't. But then it's too late to try anything different. We had that for a brief period of time. US was the only one with the nuclear bomb. Would they have used it on Japan if they had a chance to retaliate? > I don't trust statements from governments, as a general rule. I guess we agree governmental disarmament agreements wouldn't work..
- goialoq 9y ago> Would they have used it on Japan if they had a chance to retaliate? Of course. Japan's army was bent on total annihilation. If Japan had a chance to retaliate, they would have struck first.