4 ms·
> the second is the act of of entrepreneurship independent of what politico-economic context it occurs in. Given that it can't occur under socialism or communi
by julianmarq 9y ago
> the second is the act of of entrepreneurship independent of what politico-economic context it occurs in.
Given that it can't occur under socialism or communism, I don't think it is independent of the socio-economic system.
But, that aside, you have a point. However, that aside, I see no reason to believe the other person wasn't talking about both.
- dragonwriter 9y ago> Given that it can't occur under socialism or communism While the domain may be limited, it has been permitted in some degree in most real-world implementations of socialism or communism (and it was also widely practiced in pre-capitalist systems, like feudalism.) There's a relationship between the two terms (capitalism-the-economic-system was named “capitalism” by it's critics because it organizes the structure of society around the interests of those who have been most successful in in capitalism in the sense of private endeavors to acquire capital, after all.)