3 ms·
Yes, of course. The line of "heresy" is before the current data and it would never never never be changed. Because, you know, science!
by notyourday 9y ago
Yes, of course. The line of "heresy" is before the current data and it would never never never be changed. Because, you know, science!
- mikeash 9y agoSorry, I can't understand this at all. Could you restate it?
- notyourday 9y agot0 = science dataset S1 => claim "cooling!" -> everyone disagreeing is heretic! There will not be a dataset S1+S2 contradicting implication of S1! Our science is correct 4 evah! t1 = science dataset S1+S2 => claim "warming!" -> everyone disagreeing is heretic. There will be no t2 with a dataset of S1+S2+S3 that would contradict S1+S2! Our Science(tm) is correct 4 eveh!
- mikeash 9y agoOk, now I get it, but I’m not really interested in continuing the conversation with such weapons-grade sarcasm.
- yongjik 9y agohttp://chem.tufts.edu/answersinscience/relativityofwrong.htm http://chem.tufts.edu/answersinscience/relativityofwrong.htm > [W]hen people thought the earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the earth was spherical, they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together.