3 ms·
Many people disagree about what blockchain technology is. To me, it' about the characteristics, rather than how they're implemented. I see three characteristics
by trentmc 9y ago
Many people disagree about what blockchain technology is. To me, it' about the characteristics, rather than how they're implemented. I see three characteristics: decentralized, immutable, assets [1].
Under this framing, the "linked list of hashes" is one partial way to achieve immutability. And "every node has this list" is one partial way to get to decentralization is achieved. But that's only part of it. Eg you need to address: what if a node acts badly? And you want a means to create & issue assets.
> every node has a copy AND the list is append only leads me to something that doesn't scale well.
Correct. That's why there is work to scale better, e.g. via sharding by BigchainDB and by others.
[1] https://blog.bigchaindb.com/three-blockchain-benefits-ae3a2a5ab102 https://blog.bigchaindb.com/three-blockchain-benefits-ae3a2a...
- k__ 9y agoDoes sharding still let you know the "whole truth"?
- k__ 9y agoAlso, I had the impression that a blockchain is a specific type of data structure. So, what you are describing seems like a way to accomplish behavior of this kind of data structure with a different one so you may get bettee scaling out of it.
- trentmc 9y agoAs you'll see in my other comments (and articles on it), "blockchain" is better described as a field with a set of related goals for technology artifacts, rather than a specific data structure [1]. I frame it as: it has blockchain characteristics if it's decentralized, immutable, and assets [2]. This is a much healthier framing, because it doesn't constrain the goals to a particular approach (e.g. a particular data structure). [1] https://blog.bigchaindb.com/blockchain-as-a-field-47c9f4589418 https://blog.bigchaindb.com/blockchain-as-a-field-47c9f45894... [2] https://blog.bigchaindb.com/three-blockchain-benefits-ae3a2a5ab102 https://blog.bigchaindb.com/three-blockchain-benefits-ae3a2a...
- trentmc 9y ago"Truth" of course is a red herring. "Claim" is better. And, "digitally signed claim" is better yet. Then to answer your Q: a good sharding approach should let you see all digitally signed claims (including when those claims were made) with probability --> 1.0. I'm framing this probabilistically because many sharding approaches rely on that definition. (And even non-sharded blockchains like Bitcoin itself.)