5 ms·
so what are they doing in one sentence?
by gondo 9y ago
so what are they doing in one sentence?
- nicoburns 9y agoUsing machine learning to attempt to detect twitter accounts backed by bots.
- _jal 9y agoRunning a service that attempts to determine if a given Twitter account is a political bot.
- GCU-Empiricist 9y agoWriting an automated service that classifies if a twitter account is a political bot. No word on their error rates.
- finniananderson 9y agoIt's impossible to determine the error rate - there is no way of knowing for sure if an account is a bot or not. If there was, this model would be useless. I'd be interested to know how they trained it though, given they didn't have any true data to check against
- giarc 9y agoThey could check it against known bots though.
- Bartweiss 9y agoThat's only valid if the known bots are a random sample of all bots. They can't test against a large array of public bots because they're only detecting political bots, not everything automated. So they'd have to train/test on "accounts which are definitely known to be bots, but trying to hide it". Meaning, presumably, the least-convincing bots or bots specific to a previously-exposed network.
- stevenwoo 9y agoThere is a way, doxx every account. It's not nice but it would work 100% of the time.
- huac 9y agoSimilarly, just because you can't dox an account doesn't make it a bot.
- devrandomguy 9y agoAlso, there are APIs for acquiring real-world mailing addresses inside of "subdivided" warehouses. The only way to verify that a person isn't a bot is to make babies with them.
- ars 9y ago> The only way to verify that a person isn't a bot is to make babies with them. For some reason I feel like there are other ways......
- doctoboggan 9y agoIn the article they claim 93.5% accuracy.
- monksy 9y agoThey're trying to do bot classification on twitter.