4 ms·
Maybe some of us don't want any kind of google services on their phone, open source or not?
by Sir_Cmpwn 9y ago
Maybe some of us don't want any kind of google services on their phone, open source or not?
- Espionage724 9y agoIn that case, you can still have signature spoofing support built-into the ROM, but without microG, it just won't be used. Signature spoofing only affects app you explicitly give permission to use it, and only apps that call for it.
- velobro 9y agoThen don't get an Android phone?
- Sir_Cmpwn 9y agoWhy? AOSP doesn't talk to Google. All you need to do is not add shit to it.
- traverseda 9y agoThat how lineage ships by default. It's a bit of a pain and many other apps (even open source ones) won't work, since google is providing the library for those apps to do things like access your location.
- Sir_Cmpwn 9y agoI'm able to access my location no sweat. The proprietary google track-and-upload-everywhere-you-go thing is an anti-feature, GPS alone works perfectly for me.
- madez 9y agoPrograms that require Google Services just plain suck. That's like a game that only runs if you have a mouse from Logitech or a document viewer that only supports printinf if you have a HP printer. Both would just suck and be shitty, borderline malicious programs.
- drampelt 9y agoI don't know if that's a fair comparison since Google Services are running on the vast majority of Android devices (except in China) but Logitech or HP don't have that same market share for those respective products. I get that it's annoying if you choose not to run Google Services. But from a developer perspective if 99.9% of their target market does run Google Services and they make development of the app easier or provide useful features, I can see why they would choose to rely on them.
- kuschku 9y agoThe problem is that Google has moved almost all Android features into Google apps. You can't access the stepcounter directly anymore, only through Google Fit. Most location features are only available through Google Play's location API. You can't even get up-to-date openssl or OpenGL support in your app without Play Services.
- mcny 9y agoThe way they've done this basically has users begging for it though because the alternative would likely be excessive battery usage for some things and no updates for others. I'm on lineage but most people aren't fortunate enough to have nexus devices or don't know/care enough to run anything other than what comes with their device. I think moving everything possible to play services is helpful for them.
- larma 9y agoIf it was about the features, they could (and should) have released these bits as part of AOSP, as free software. Not doing so reveals there actual reason: control. Forcing every manufacturer to ship Play Services and thus being able to force various things on their devices is a major financial benefit. It also ensured that Amazon or Nokia were unable to set up a commercially viable Android Fork without Google.
- s73ver_ 9y agoBut, isn't the whole point of this to access Google services? If you didn't want them on your phone, why are you still using them?
- Sir_Cmpwn 9y agoNo, I don't want to access Google services. I don't want microG on my phone. I don't want Google Play Services on my phone.
- dcow 9y agoThen don't install it or uGapps. The point of uGapps it to provide an open-source implementation that can be audited so it's easier for you or me to decide if we want the code running on our phones.