Yeah, no. I think the author is somehow trying to justify his stupidity by acting as if these mosaics only got popular 9 years after he destroyed it, but no, ju

Yeah, no. I think the author is somehow trying to justify his stupidity by acting as if these mosaics only got popular 9 years after he destroyed it, but no, just no. Invader was recognized long before that, he even had an exposition in the Louvre in 1998. The Louvre. The only thing I got out of this article is that the author is probably an entitled c*nt that has no sensibility for art. He couldn't even do as much as a simple Google search after someone told him that it was made by the "french Banksy". I really can't fathom how dumb this guy is. He deserves the loss, but the world doesn't deserve the loss of an artwork because of a man's stupidity. Almost feels like the book burning scene in Fahrenheit 451...