3 ms·
You're just making stuff up, which is far worse than anecdotal data by itself.
by kadenshep 9y ago
You're just making stuff up, which is far worse than anecdotal data by itself.
- patrickg_zill 9y agoWilful blindness doesn't suit you. You can very easily find plenty of mainstream media news articles about Hillary's million plus fake followers, and you can look at election era tweets and retweets yourself.
- kadenshep 9y agoReports and stories are not the same as evidence. Go ahead and start providing credible sources and you might actually have a point.
- patrickg_zill 9y ago2015 (before election even got into high gear) Hillary's fake followers: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3038621/More-2-MILLION-Hillary-Clinton-s-Twitter-followers-fake-never-tweet.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3038621/More-2-MILLI... (many variations of this story on various sites) early 2016: http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2016/04/28/in-world-of-internet-fame-social-media-followers-arent-always-what-they-seem/ http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2016/04/28/in-world-of-intern... Obvious evidence of Hillary re-tweet fakery: http://sadbottrue.com/article/chapter-28-hillarys-junk-bot-retweeters/ http://sadbottrue.com/article/chapter-28-hillarys-junk-bot-r... http://sadbottrue.com/article/chapter-27-order-followers-for-hillary/ http://sadbottrue.com/article/chapter-27-order-followers-for... PS: https://www.twitteraudit.com/HillaryClinton https://www.twitteraudit.com/HillaryClinton
- kadenshep 9y agoYeah, I'm sorry, you must have been confused when I said reports and stories are not the same as evidence. And then you linked to the daily mail of all things. And the most credible report you linked to was just completely unhelpful to the point you're trying to make. Don't bother me with your unmitigated stupidity again.
- patrickg_zill 9y agoYou want to be a sheep, it's your choice.
- kadenshep 9y agoYou are literally saying nothing of substance.