4 ms·
I voted for the Developer Feedback issue you linked. > Currently we have to use CEF [https://cefsharp.github.io https://cefsharp.github.io] https://bitbucket.
by j_s 9y ago
I voted for the Developer Feedback issue you linked.
> Currently we have to use CEF [https://cefsharp.github.io https://cefsharp.github.io]
https://bitbucket.org/geckofx https://bitbucket.org/geckofx
What benefits would an open-source Edge provide to developers that the combination of Chrome and Firefox don't already?
PS. 100% managed C# HTML renderer: https://github.com/ArthurHub/HTML-Renderer https://github.com/ArthurHub/HTML-Renderer
[edited]
- yunyu 9y agoFor me, the main thing is that scrolling on a touchpad in Windows feels extremely "off" on Chrome and Firefox, while Edge manages it perfectly. Additionally, Edge has lower power consumption than Chrome.
- j_s 9y ago> Edge has lower power consumption than Chrome Thanks! This is a real differentiator. It it unfortunate that Microsoft does not currently allow hosting of the Edge renderer "by design". https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31773359/add-new-microsoft-edge-to-web-browser-control https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31773359/add-new-microso...
- lwansbrough 9y ago> PS. 100% managed C# rendering engine While this works, it's very limited in terms of HTML feature support. Not something you can give to a web developer and say "here use this to make a JS app."