> quality of the Linux kernel has not been negatively impacted I don't think that would be a good argument to make from either perspective. If people who choos

> quality of the Linux kernel has not been negatively impacted I don't think that would be a good argument to make from either perspective. If people who choose to leave the community don't contribute you can't really measure lost contribution. That not being the crux of the issue, we should focus on the following. Just because a product is successful does not mean that the abuse that happens during development of that product is good or okay. And I think that's really the gist of what people are saying.