5 ms·
What about Gothamist? I would bet it was profitable since it was run independently for a long time. It was a glorified blog — lots of reprinting Post articles r
by berberous 9y ago
What about Gothamist? I would bet it was profitable since it was run independently for a long time. It was a glorified blog — lots of reprinting Post articles rather than the independent reporting that DNA Info did, so I imagine it had much lower costs.
- rexf 9y agoThis tweet by someone who appears to have written for Gothamist claims that "Gothamist actually WAS profitable. DNAInfo wasn't." https://twitter.com/lindsayism/status/926201373858856962 https://twitter.com/lindsayism/status/926201373858856962