4 ms·
It's still up in the air I think - you can see from his blog[1] that others in the the committee prefer a syntax more like meta::type interface(const meta:
by kevinnk 9y ago
It's still up in the air I think - you can see from his blog[1] that others in the the committee prefer a syntax more like
meta::type interface(const meta::type source) {
// … basically same code …
};
[1] https://herbsutter.com/2017/07/26/metaclasses-thoughts-on-generative-c/ https://herbsutter.com/2017/07/26/metaclasses-thoughts-on-ge...
- 0xFFC 9y agoThank you, I didn't know that. This syntax makes much more sense. Considering C++ style programming. I am very interested in having Reflection in C++. But tbh $ makes it really awkward.