3 ms·
The first argument is flat-out ridiculous. The same argument could be used against farming or housing or even building communities. The second is very real and
by lagadu 9y ago
The first argument is flat-out ridiculous. The same argument could be used against farming or housing or even building communities.
The second is very real and of course requires us to tread very carefully but shouldn't be a reason to stop investigating something.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- wutbrodo 9y agoIt's ridiculous, but it's ubiquitous (and thus worth bringing, at least to acknowledge its existence in the discourse and decision making around this topic). Most people simply don't think very hard, and "no pain no gain" virtue arguments are apparently deeply ingrained in most people's approach to things like this.