3 ms·

> If video content would be so "hostile", it would have failed on its own already. People would flock to other places where they can read instead. That is not

by 1_2__4 9y ago

> If video content would be so "hostile", it would have failed on its own already. People would flock to other places where they can read instead. That is not the slightest bit true and is in fact the entire basis for the conversation we’re having.

Alex3917 9y ago
> That is not the slightest bit true and is in fact the entire basis for the conversation we’re having. Is it? The original article is talking about web tracking, the entire point of which is to give you more of whatever you like. Facebook just gives you more of whatever you click on, so if you're disappointed with the stuff you get on Facebook then probably you're just in denial about your own tastes or identity.
- K0SM0S 9y ago
  Agreed. Anecdotal, but I recently managed to reorient my Facebook feed into a more "positive" light. - I systematically un-followed sources of "negative" content (e.g. stupid, demeaning, cynical, deceptive/disingenuous, etc.) One strike, max two. This included some friends (repeated offenders - lol). No engagement whatsoever with these posts (no 'angry'/'sad' reaction, no display of comments). - I liked/followed many "positive" pages/communities (notably authors, non-fiction books, self-help or growth-mindset). - I made a point to like/comment/share "positive" posts and comments (e.g. clever, beautiful, grateful, fair, virtuous, etc.) My main criteria was quality, above topic. E.g. bye-bye "petty" content even if it's "science" (which I like). I was quite selective, as it's easy to re-sub later. I stayed unusually long on the site over a few days, to extensively clean/curate my feed. Within a week, everything changed to suit my newfound tastes: basic feed is great, ads/sponsored content more relevant; it even seems there's been a positive shift in post sentiment selected from my contacts. My Facebook feed is actually somewhat pleasant now. It fits my mindset of choice (away from the overly critical/cynical/negative individual I used to be in previous years). All it took is a little self-discipline and some manual curating (I've always refrained from liking too many sources, so there wasn't much to deal with).

by 1_2__4 9y ago

Alex3917 9y ago

> That is not the slightest bit true and is in fact the entire basis for the conversation we’re having. Is it? The original article is talking about web tracking, the entire point of which is to give you more of whatever you like. Facebook just gives you more of whatever you click on, so if you're disappointed with the stuff you get on Facebook then probably you're just in denial about your own tastes or identity.

K0SM0S 9y ago
Agreed. Anecdotal, but I recently managed to reorient my Facebook feed into a more "positive" light. - I systematically un-followed sources of "negative" content (e.g. stupid, demeaning, cynical, deceptive/disingenuous, etc.) One strike, max two. This included some friends (repeated offenders - lol). No engagement whatsoever with these posts (no 'angry'/'sad' reaction, no display of comments). - I liked/followed many "positive" pages/communities (notably authors, non-fiction books, self-help or growth-mindset). - I made a point to like/comment/share "positive" posts and comments (e.g. clever, beautiful, grateful, fair, virtuous, etc.) My main criteria was quality, above topic. E.g. bye-bye "petty" content even if it's "science" (which I like). I was quite selective, as it's easy to re-sub later. I stayed unusually long on the site over a few days, to extensively clean/curate my feed. Within a week, everything changed to suit my newfound tastes: basic feed is great, ads/sponsored content more relevant; it even seems there's been a positive shift in post sentiment selected from my contacts. My Facebook feed is actually somewhat pleasant now. It fits my mindset of choice (away from the overly critical/cynical/negative individual I used to be in previous years). All it took is a little self-discipline and some manual curating (I've always refrained from liking too many sources, so there wasn't much to deal with).