3 ms·
This is useful, but I can't imagine someone paying for it. I hope I'm wrong.
by fiatjaf 9y ago
This is useful, but I can't imagine someone paying for it. I hope I'm wrong.
- jsegura 9y agoThis is what we want to confirm. We believe that this can be useful when integrating on your own systems, like CI/CD, monitoring, etc. What is the use case that made you to believe this is useful? Thanks for the feedback!
- fiatjaf 9y agoNot an use-case I have currently for myself, but I thought that wikis and other services that host content written by third-parties would be better if they checked broken-links and notified visitors and content creators. Maybe my use-case is limiting my ability to think about someone paying for it.
- davidpelayo 9y agoHow certain startups CMS based content could go checking broken-links? 1. They implement their own checker - fair enough, if they want to do it. 2. They use a micro API for it and forget about investing the time on it, if it works well for them.
- fiatjaf 9y agoNow I can imagine it :P
- davidpelayo 9y agoSo, just trying to understand: how is that you find it useful but can't imagine someone paying for it? Could you elaborate a bit more?
- fiatjaf 9y agoWould you pay for air?