I don't think it's a problem with the Creator conjecture itself, but with the theological encrustations, lacking anything resembling real-world evidentiary supp

I don't think it's a problem with the Creator conjecture itself, but with the theological encrustations, lacking anything resembling real-world evidentiary support, that people keep attaching to that conjecture. Example: Compare the elaborate theology, christology, and soteriology of the Apostle's Creed and the Nicene Creed, on the one hand, against the pretty-simple statements attributed in the Synoptic Gospels to Y'shua of Nazareth, a.k.a. Jesus. (I discount heavily the statements attributed to him in the Fourth Gospel [0].) [0] See "Synoptic Christians vs. John Christians: A Critique," at http://www.questioningchristian.com/2006/05/synoptic_christ.html http://www.questioningchristian.com/2006/05/synoptic_christ.... (self-cite).