4 ms·
> People may feel uneasy about this, but what is the alternative? The FTC or Congress should regulate these things, not a volunteer, highly self-interested oli
by forapurpose 9y ago
> People may feel uneasy about this, but what is the alternative?
The FTC or Congress should regulate these things, not a volunteer, highly self-interested oligopoly. I think the government has not kept up: Just like law enforcement is not effective in protecting you against cybercrime, the FTC and Congress haven't kept up with trade issues on the Internet. It's 2017; these issues are no longer new.
I like Mozilla, but in the long run there's not much reason to think that the current arrangement will take seriously the interests of users and consumers, as well as CAs, small browser vendors, others using public key crypto, and other stakeholders. Those people need a seat at the table, a vote, power. That's what democratic government and regulation are for: Situations where power should be distributed democratically, not to whomever has the most marketshare.
- hannob 9y ago> The FTC or Congress should regulate these things, not a volunteer, highly self-interested oligopoly. The Internet is not limited to the US. Also existing attempts of gov regulation of crypto aren't exactly a success story. We had two major fuckups very recently of crypto that had multiple government crypto-certifications.