3 ms·
> so "readable without any software" is a good test for wether it's "readable with any sfotware" What an extraordinarily stupid notion. Your filesystem is not
by _pmf_ 9y ago
> so "readable without any software" is a good test for wether it's "readable with any sfotware"
What an extraordinarily stupid notion. Your filesystem is not readable without a filesystem driver for the specific binary format used to represent it, so you cannot even read your text file without having something in your stack that understands a more structured data organization scheme.
- enord 9y agoYes, but that comes with the operating system that comes with the computer i bought and use in the house which comes with electricity from the electrical grid in the city that lies in an aerated valley (luckily!) on the third planet from the sun. I should have added a disclaimer i guess.
- justinclift 9y agoJust to point out... SQLite comes built it to pretty much every OS these days too. :)
- chriswarbo 9y ago> Your filesystem is not readable without a filesystem driver for the specific binary format used to represent it, so you cannot even read your text file without having something in your stack that understands a more structured data organization scheme. This argument doesn't hold water, since file content doesn't depend on which filesystem it's on. An archiver may choose to store data in some very particular way, like some specific tape driver. They're free to do that without corrupting the content of any files, since the files don't depend on the filesystem. On the other hand, if an archiver chose to store, say, unzipped versions of their opendocument files, then they've corrupted the data: opendocument files are zips, unzipped data is not opendocument. The format does depend on the file content.