4 ms·
>why is it dark? I doubt the training data/AI will be accountable or visible to the citizens (yes, the analyst gets fired/van'd, but someone else takes his pla
by FLUX-YOU 9y ago
>why is it dark?
I doubt the training data/AI will be accountable or visible to the citizens (yes, the analyst gets fired/van'd, but someone else takes his place).
So we're trusting the intel agencies, but they're trusting an AI to some extent. They're plainly not dumb enough to let the AI drive, but it still plays a part.
I'm not worried about an AI being able to sift data given a training set to some degree of accuracy. I'm more worried about the training set as a dark way of generating actionable intelligence, for good or bad purposes.
- jonnybgood 9y agoAll things used in war is a double-edged sword. Unfortunately, that's the reality of it. Personally, the benefits of AI in intelligence outweighs the costs from my own experience.
- dTal 9y agoWhich is why a permanent war posture is a frightening thing in a government. I'm curious about your personal experience of the benefits and costs of AI in intelligence? It seems unlikely that you will have been on the receiving end of the full potential cost of that AI.