4 ms·
no performance evaluation on MSCOCO
by DFASDF 9y ago
no performance evaluation on MSCOCO
- iaw 9y agoDid you create an account just to criticize the original posters work?
- waleedka 9y agoEvaluation code against MS COCO is included in the repository, both for bounding boxes and segmentation masks so it should be easy to run (but takes a long time). We should publish more details, though. Thanks for bringing it up. Our implementation deviates a bit from the paper (as mentioned in the documentation), and optimizing for COCO was a 'nice to have' rather than being the main objective. We got pretty close to the reported numbers (within 3 to 4 percentage points) but that was with half the training steps compared to the paper. We'll try to add more details over the next few days.