I find the title on HN to be overly dramatic. There have been criticisms of this bias for at least 40 years that I'm aware of. What this article does is add mor

I find the title on HN to be overly dramatic. There have been criticisms of this bias for at least 40 years that I'm aware of. What this article does is add more empirical nuance to this well-worn criticism but it's certainly not upending anything.