3 ms·
No, not "thinks it's clever", but overly clever, yes, often.
by kreetx 9y ago
No, not "thinks it's clever", but overly clever, yes, often.
- mitchty 9y agoI tend to ignore 99% of the clever haskell stuff and get by just fine in Haskell. I keep learning about stuff like GADTs and whatnot, but they're more like the top of the tool drawer special tools than the ones you break out every day. I think people learning/using haskell tend to go for crazy generalized code first, versus what gets me to a minimal working thing that I can expand/change out later. Or I just suck at haskell, probably a little from column a and b, for me more sucking at haskell than anything.
- tome 9y ago> Or I just suck at haskell You suck at Haskell about as much as Don Stewart :) In this talk he describes how he builds large software systems in Haskell and eschews complicated type system features https://skillsmatter.com/skillscasts/9098-haskell-in-the-large-the-day-to-day-practice-of-using-haskell-to-write-large-systems https://skillsmatter.com/skillscasts/9098-haskell-in-the-lar...
- mitchty 9y agoGood to know i'm in good company then. :)