4 ms·
Yes, and the things he says about it indicate he does think programming languages are important.
by mikebenfield 9y ago
Yes, and the things he says about it indicate he does think programming languages are important.
- grzm 9y agoI think there may be a bit of people talking past each other here. I think one can reasonably say that which language one uses isn't as important as which features that language has. Also, there comment you originally responded says "that programming languages (including his own) are the most important aspect of doing our programming work well." That doesn't mean that the language or its features aren't important. They're saying that it's not the most important thing. The hierarchy Rich refers to[0] puts domain complexity and misconception as 10× more important than anything that's language specific. I believe this is the basis of the quote I pulled. I think this is compatible with thinking that language features are important, but domain complexity and misconception are more important issues when tackling a problem with code. [0]: https://github.com/matthiasn/talk-transcripts/blob/master/Hickey_Rich/EffectivePrograms/00.27.19.png https://github.com/matthiasn/talk-transcripts/blob/master/Hi...