3 ms·
That's been experimental for a long time - https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tree/master/fs/9p https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tree/master/fs/9p I guess file
by voltagex_ 9y ago
That's been experimental for a long time - https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tree/master/fs/9p https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tree/master/fs/9p
I guess file systems don't go into staging/?
- LukeShu 9y agoOn Arch Linux, it's been enabled by default for several years, and I've been using it daily for that time. On x86_64, it's plenty stable, but I see why it's still experimental: On i686 there's a bug where files are mysteriously missing from directory listings. I tried to debug it once; it's reading them from the protocol correctly, but they're being dropped in the VFS layer, which is a bit more complicated than the network protocol.
- thisrod 9y agoMaybe, once FUSE came along, 9pfuse made more sense than putting 9p in the kernel? https://9fans.github.io/plan9port/man/man4/9pfuse.html https://9fans.github.io/plan9port/man/man4/9pfuse.html
- exikyut 9y agoI was just wondering, as I began to read the article: which would perform better - in-kernel 9P, or FUSE? Intuitively I get the idea that FUSE is going to be the better performer overall because of lack of network overhead. But I wonder how much worse 9P would be.