> But time and again the better candidates had the worse résumés Perhaps this is selection bias? Their resume being bad caused them to not be able to get a jo

> But time and again the better candidates had the worse résumés Perhaps this is selection bias? Their resume being bad caused them to not be able to get a job at other companies, even though they are good. The only reason the resume ended up on your desk was because nobody else wanted to spend 30 minutes of their time interviewing them, therefore they were passed up.