3 ms·
You've mentioned several ways to reduce the number of candidates that you consider for each role, but I don't see how any of it leads to better quality hires.
by citizens 9y ago
You've mentioned several ways to reduce the number of candidates that you consider for each role, but I don't see how any of it leads to better quality hires.
- user5994461 9y agoWhen you have hundreds of people to interview, the quantity is a huge problem. You can't interview the majority of them. His question takes away the people who are not interested. It's useful.
- davehtaylor 9y agoIt also seems to remove the people who may or may not actually understand the fundamentals of the language they claim to have experience in, rather only knowing how to cobble together frameworks and/or copypasta code.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- austincheney 9y agoCandidates that need a coding crutch are less valuable than candidates that don't. Likewise candidates they are so petty or so completely lacking of confidence to perform without their preferred toy are less valuable and less flexible than those candidates who can perform in the actual technologies. If this is a measure to eliminate candidates who are ultimately less interested in doing the work then so be it.