I haven't read the case against "private" and "public", but I also think that it is good to support private/public qualifiers. That said, it is unfortunate tha

I haven't read the case against "private" and "public", but I also think that it is good to support private/public qualifiers. That said, it is unfortunate that the blogger tries to get his point across through a title that gratuitously insults Steve. It is even more sad that these titles turn out to be the best way to capture people's attention. I'm assuming that the post would have gotten a fraction of the page views (and upvotes) if it had used a more reasonable title.