> a man wouldn't have to think about his personal safety as much by attending the event they won This is a part I'm not sure to understand. You were supposed t

> a man wouldn't have to think about his personal safety as much by attending the event they won This is a part I'm not sure to understand. You were supposed to hold a booth in a summit, which I assume was in a public setting. Surely, this should have been a serious deterrent on any physical assault. If despite this your partner started threatening you, wouldn't it have been possible to get the security to step in?